Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Telecare monitoring is not ‘disembodied’ work


Calling for Care: ‘Disembodied’ Work, Teleoperators and Older People Living at Home

Abstract: The provision of ‘distant’ care to older people living at home through telecare technologies is often contrasted negatively to hands-on, face-to-face care: telecare is seen as a loss of care, a dehumanization. Here we challenge this view, arguing that teleoperators in telecare services do provide care to older people, often at significant emotional cost to themselves. Based on a European Commission-funded ethnographic study of two English telecare monitoring centres, we argue that telecare is not ‘disembodied’ work, but a form of care performed through the use of voice, knowledge sharing and emotional labour or self-management. We also show, in distinction to discourses promoting telecare in the UK, that successful telecare relies on the existence of social networks and the availability of hands-on care. Telecare is not a substitute for, or the opposite of, hands-on care but is at its best interwoven with it.

Authors:
Celia Roberts, Lancaster University, UK
Maggie Mort, Lancaster University, UK
Christine Milligan, Lancaster University, UK

Full paper at:


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Remote monitoring of patients with heart implants

Can we get eight billion hearts on speed dial? Leslie Saxon of the USC Center for Body Computing shows the diagnostic and data potential of marrying smartphone tech with heart monitors.